Divergent Resource Logic — DRL
The DRL Thesis Codex

The work, in full.

A 136-page framework for full-boundary carbon accounting in the construction industry. The Codex is the document everything else on this site rests on. It is offered free, in PDF, with every citation, for any reader, regulator, scientist, journalist, or attorney who wants the underlying argument in its complete form.


Download

DRL Thesis Codex v4.3.0 — IRONCLAD

The full Codex as a single PDF. 136 pages. 1.6 MB. Released 1 May 2026.

Download the full Codex (PDF, 1.6 MB)

What is in it

Structure of the Codex

The Codex is organised into chapters that move from the underlying science, through the standards architecture, into the worked examples, and out to the implications. The full table of contents is in the document itself; this is the high-level shape.

ChapterWhat it does
Sections 1–3Establishes the framework. Defines full-boundary accounting. Names the three excluded liability categories: soil organic carbon efflux, end-of-life methane, foregone sequestration. Sets out the auditor's posture used throughout.
Sections 4–5The biogenic-carbon-neutrality convention. How it entered the standards (ISO 14040/44, EN 15804). What the 2018 EPA biomass policy statement actually says, in its own words, about whether it is a scientific determination.
Section 6The three liabilities, in detail. Peer-reviewed source ranges for each. The arithmetic for translating from research-paper units into per-cubic-metre emission factors comparable to the ones already in use for steel, concrete, and aluminium.
Section 7Worked examples. Section 7.4 is the NECO₂ / New Zealand example — also available as a standalone download. Shows the framework applied to a real, well-governed, publicly-funded national carbon repository.
Sections 8–13Materials-level analysis. Timber against the structural alternatives. Aluminium recovery credit. Steel module D. Concrete carbonation. The full re-ranking under common-boundary disclosure.
Section 14Methodological finding on AI-system bias in carbon-accounting outputs. Records how different AI systems trained on biogenic-myth-saturated data reproduce the myth; documented as part of the thesis itself.
Sections 15+ / AppendicesImplementation appendices. References. Source documentation. The full evidentiary record.

Joint authorship note

Human-AI collaboration, disclosed

The Codex is a human-AI collaborative research work. Lead author Murphy O'Neal originated all core logic, hypotheses, field evidence, and policy positions. AI systems contributed synthesis, citation research, structural drafting, and document architecture across the version history (Grok through v3.0; Claude from v3.1; Jeeves AI peer review pass; documented in Section 14).

The collaboration is disclosed in the document itself, on the title page, with version dates and the role of each AI system listed. The contrast between AI behaviour observed during the research — some systems reproducing the biogenic-myth pattern from their training data, others able to follow the auditor's logic against it — is treated in Section 14 as part of the thesis, not as a footnote. The version history is also in the document.


Citation

How to cite the Codex

If you cite the Codex in academic, regulatory, journalistic, or legal work, the suggested citation is:

O'Neal, M. (2026). Divergent Resource Logic (DRL): A Strategic Framework for Immediate Climate Mitigation via Accelerated Industrial Ecology and Permanent Carbon Reserves. Version 4.3.0 (IRONCLAD). Available at fullboundarycarbon.org/codex.html. — Suggested citation

The Codex is offered under open licensing for free distribution and citation. Reproduction in full or in substantial extract requires attribution. Commercial redistribution requires permission.


Companion documents

What sits alongside the Codex

Three companion documents extend the Codex into specific terrain. They are available on the companions page.