One room. Every calculator.
Every standard. Every regulator.
A curated directory of the carbon-accounting infrastructure that governs the construction industry. Calculators, standards, certifications, regulators, scientific bodies, datasets, and active legal cases — laid out together so the divergence between them is visible. None of these organisations is affiliated with this site.
The directory is organised by function. Within each section, entries are listed alphabetically. Every entry carries a one-line description of what the organisation actually does. Where an entry's relationship to the DRL framework is direct, it is noted in italics at the end of the description.
The free public-access calculators
These are the tools an architect, engineer, or specifier sits in front of when they make a material decision. Each implements a particular standards regime. The DRL Corrected Ledger uses these calculators' published outputs as the baseline for recomputation.
Building Transparency / Carbon Leadership Forum. Free North American database of EPDs. Widely used in U.S. specification practice. Implements EN 15978 boundary.
Athena Sustainable Materials Institute. North American whole-building LCA tool. Source of the Brock Commons EBD on the Corrected Ledger.
BRANZ / MBIE. New Zealand's national construction-materials carbon repository. Subject of Codex Section 7.4 worked example.
BRANZ. Early-design comparator tool, paired with NECO₂. The interface where the EN 15978 boundary becomes visible to a practitioner.
Inventory of Carbon and Energy. UK academic database widely cited in early-design embodied carbon assessment.
WoodWorks Wood Products Council. Industry-funded LCA and carbon calculators distributed free to architects. Source of the T3 Minneapolis disclosures on the Corrected Ledger.
Commercial whole-building LCA platform used widely in Europe. Implements EN 15978.
Revit-integrated whole-building LCA tool widely used in North American architectural practice.
The standards that define the boundary
These are the standards that decide what gets counted and what does not. The DRL framework is, in substantive terms, an argument about where these standards have set the line.
The international LCA standard. Defines life cycle assessment methodology globally. Origin of the biogenic-zero accounting convention.
Sustainability in buildings — Environmental product declarations. Assigns the LULUC characterisation factor of zero to certified "sustainably managed" forestry. The off switch, in the auditor's voice.
European standard for whole-building LCA. The standard most national building LCAs implement. Excludes B1 by methodological choice.
European standard for EPDs of construction products. The product-level companion to EN 15978.
Technical Committee for environmental management standards. The committee that produces ISO 14040/14044.
Sustainability in buildings and civil engineering works. The committee that produces ISO 21930.
Greenhouse Gas Protocol — the most widely used corporate emissions accounting framework. Scope 1 / 2 / 3 definitions used in nearly every ESG disclosure.
University of Washington-based research collaborative. Authors of the Embodied Carbon Reduction Toolkit and a major influence on North American embodied-carbon practice.
The bodies that issue the labels
These are the third-party schemes that issue the certifications referenced inside the standards. FSC and PEFC — between them — produce the "sustainably managed" designation that ISO 21930 then translates into a LULUC characterisation factor of zero.
International forest certification body. Founded 1993. One of two certifying bodies whose label switches the LULUC factor to zero under ISO 21930.
International umbrella for national forest certification schemes including SFI (US/Canada) and CSA (Canada). The other certifying body whose label switches the LULUC factor to zero.
North American forest certification standard. Industry-backed. Subject of an active Competition Bureau complaint filed by Ecojustice and seven other Canadian environmental organisations.
Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design. U.S. Green Building Council. The dominant North American building-level sustainability rating system.
Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method. UK-origin building rating system widely used in Europe.
Corporate emissions target validation. Used widely in ESG investment screening.
Sustainability reporting standards. Most widely used corporate sustainability disclosure framework worldwide.
IFRS-affiliated body developing global sustainability disclosure standards (IFRS S1 and S2). Increasingly influential post-2024.
The agencies that hold the pen
Government agencies, international bodies, and intergovernmental panels that produce the regulatory framework within which the standards operate.
The scientific authority cited by every national greenhouse gas inventory. Source of the methane GWP100 value (27.9, AR6) used throughout the DRL framework.
UN Framework Convention on Climate Change. The treaty under which all national GHG inventories are submitted. Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF) reporting requirement.
U.S. federal environmental regulator. April 2018 statement of policy on forest biomass — the document that classifies biomass combustion as carbon-neutral while stating, in its own text, "this is not a scientific determination."
U.S. federal forestry agency. Administers the Wood Innovations Grant Program ($93M+ 2015–2025 + $95M FY2026 announced).
U.S. corporate disclosure regulator. Climate disclosure rule status varies; relevant to scope-3 disclosure of construction-sector emissions.
European Union regulation on deforestation-free products. The first major regulatory instrument that requires landscape-side accounting of timber product origin.
European Union restriction on environmental marketing claims. Comes into force September 2026. Restricts use of "carbon neutral" and similar in EU advertising without rigorous substantiation.
New Zealand environmental regulator. Author of the April 2024 GHG Inventory Snapshot quoted in Codex Section 7.4: "afforestation causes an increase in net emissions in the year of planting."
UK environmental regulator. Publishes the UK greenhouse gas inventory and conversion factors widely cited in corporate carbon accounting.
Intergovernmental energy and emissions analysis body. Construction sector emissions analyses are widely cited.
Where carbon has a price
Government-administered carbon-pricing schemes. The price-side context for the disclosure-side argument the DRL framework is making.
European Union Emissions Trading System. The world's first and largest carbon market.
New Zealand Emissions Trading Scheme. Includes forestry. Diagnostic context for Codex Section 7.4 and the Te Uru Rakau companion paper in preparation.
Global mapping of carbon pricing instruments. The reference for cross-jurisdictional comparison of carbon prices.
Verified Carbon Standard. The largest voluntary carbon market standard. Subject of multiple greenwashing class actions including Dib v. Apple Inc.
Where the money is recorded
Public databases that track industry lobbying, political spending, and grant funding. The empirical record from which the DRL framework's configuration analysis is built.
Center for Responsive Politics. The standard reference for U.S. federal lobbying disclosure data.
U.S. federal campaign finance disclosure.
U.S. Senate disclosure portal for federal lobbying activity under the LDA.
U.S. federal docket for public comment on proposed rules. The entry point for public participation in regulatory rulemaking.
Congressional watchdog. Publishes reports on federal grant programs, including Forest Service mass-timber programmes referenced in CRS R47752.
Congressional research arm. CRS Report R47752 is the source for the Forest Service / WoodWorks attribution finding quoted in the Reagan paper.
Where the underlying science is done
Research institutes, scientific bodies, and peer-reviewed journals that produce the underlying carbon science the DRL framework draws on. These are not advocacy organisations; they are the data producers.
Independent research institute. Global Forest Watch. Co-authors of Searchinger/Peng (Nature 2023) on the carbon costs of global wood harvests.
Peer-reviewed scientific journal. Publication venue for the Searchinger/Peng 2023 paper and the subsequent Sohngen/Baker/Favero critique and Searchinger/Berry/Peng reply in Nature 646.
WRI-administered satellite monitoring platform. Real-time tracking of forest loss worldwide.
New Zealand forestry Crown research institute (now part of Bioeconomy Science Institute). Source of the Long-Term Site Productivity trial data cited in Codex Section 7.4.
New Zealand soils and land-use research Crown research institute. S-Map national soil database; National Soil Carbon Monitoring System.
New Zealand atmospheric and climate research institute. Atmospheric inversion programmes that constrain national-scale emissions accounting.
Canadian forest products research institute. Source of A1–A3 emission factors used in the Corrected Ledger calculations.
The U.S. Forest Service's research arm for the Southern U.S. Source of the loblolly pine rotation-age data referenced in the Reagan companion paper.
Where the disclosure regime is being tested
Active lawsuits and regulatory complaints on greenwashing, carbon claims, and forestry certification. The legal context within which the DRL framework's findings will eventually be tested.
U.S. District Court, Northern District of California; appealed to 9th Circuit. First scientific challenge to a corporate "carbon neutral" marketing claim based on forestry offsets.
Canadian Competition Bureau complaint against the Sustainable Forestry Initiative. Filed by eight environmental organisations.
Frankfurt Regional Court, Germany. Won August 2024 — Apple's "CO₂ neutral" Apple Watch claim ruled misleading.
Taking it further
The DRL framework is a contribution to the public record. The following channels exist for that record to enter regulatory, legislative, journalistic, and legal processes. None of these organisations is affiliated with this site. The list is organised by function.
The committees that hold jurisdiction
These are the committees with direct jurisdiction over the policy instruments documented in the DRL corpus — the Farm Bill, the Wood Innovations Program, the LIMBER Act, and forestry carbon accounting. Formal written submissions are a legitimate channel at each of them.
Chair: Senator John Boozman (R-AR). Ranking Member: Senator Amy Klobuchar (D-MN). Jurisdiction over the Farm Bill, USDA Forest Service programs, and the Wood Innovations Grant Program. The Subcommittee on Conservation, Forestry, Natural Resources, and Biotechnology holds direct jurisdiction over forestry carbon policy. 328A Russell Senate Office Building, Washington DC 20510.
Jurisdiction over forestry legislation in the House. The relevant subcommittee for forestry carbon accounting is Conservation, Research, Biotechnology, and Foreign Agriculture.
Shared jurisdiction over federal forest management with the Agriculture Committee. Relevant to USDA Forest Service land-management decisions with carbon-accounting implications.
Formal channel for public submissions to NZ Parliamentary select committees. Relevant to the Primary Production Committee (forestry legislation) and the Environment Committee (NZ ETS, climate policy). The Te Uru Rākau companion paper in preparation is the DRL corpus's primary NZ legislative contribution.
Environment, Public Health, and Food Safety. Jurisdiction over the EUDR, EU Green Claims Directive, and EU LULUCF Regulation. Public consultation periods are the formal submission channel.
Open dockets
Active and recurring public dockets where technical submissions on forestry carbon accounting enter the permanent regulatory record.
Central portal for U.S. federal regulatory comment submissions. Relevant dockets include the EPA's Renewable Fuel Standard program (biogenic carbon treatment) and any future revision of the April 2018 biomass carbon-neutrality policy statement. Comments filed here become part of the permanent administrative record.
All proposed federal rules with open comment periods appear here. The authoritative source for comment deadlines, docket IDs, and submission instructions for any EPA, USDA, or SEC rulemaking touching carbon accounting or forest biomass classification.
New Zealand Environmental Protection Authority public participation portal. Relevant to NZ ETS forestry provisions. The NZ Emissions Trading Scheme Review is the most directly relevant open process.
EU public consultation portal covering all legislation in development including EUDR implementation guidance and Green Claims Directive secondary legislation. Submissions from non-EU stakeholders are accepted in most consultations.
Organisations with active litigation in this space
These organisations have demonstrated legal capacity in greenwashing, environmental disclosure, and forestry. Research submissions are a legitimate form of engagement. None has been contacted by this site; none is affiliated with it.
Environmental law charity. Active in over 60 countries. Track record includes greenwashing cases against Shell, KLM, and BlackRock; illegal logging litigation in Africa. The DRL framework's ESG portfolio valuation finding — systematically excluded liabilities not reflected in current ESG accounting — is in ClientEarth's operational territory.
U.S. nonprofit public interest environmental law organisation. 200+ full-time lawyers. Track record in EPA administrative law, forest protection, and climate disclosure. Relevant to any challenge to the EPA's April 2018 biomass carbon-neutrality policy statement, which is an administrative policy instrument subject to challenge under the Clean Air Act.
Canada's largest environmental law charity. Already cited in the DRL corpus as co-filer of the active Competition Bureau complaint against the Sustainable Forestry Initiative. The most direct existing legal parallel to the DRL framework's certification-system findings.
U.S. research organisation focused on carbon accounting integrity. Peer-reviewed analyses of voluntary carbon market offset invalidation, forest carbon permanence failures, and accounting boundary mismatches. A technical research partner whose findings are used in legal and regulatory proceedings.
Outlets covering this territory
These outlets have published on forestry carbon accounting, ESG greenwashing, or adjacent disclosure failures. A research referral with primary sources attached is the appropriate form of contact.
UK-based specialist publication covering climate science and policy. Data-driven. Peer-reviewed. Track record in forestry carbon and LULUCF accounting. The Searchinger / Sohngen exchange in Nature 646 — directly relevant to the DRL foregone-sequestration finding — is the kind of scientific dispute Carbon Brief covers as a primary story.
U.S. Pulitzer Prize-winning investigative news organisation. Covers federal forestry policy, ESG disclosure, and the political economy of climate regulation. The outlet that first documented Exxon's internal 1982 climate models. Tips: insideclimatenews.org/contact.
U.S. investigative newsroom. Covers EPA regulatory policy, USDA programmes, and corporate environmental disclosure. Secure tip submission at propublica.org/tips. The USDA Wood Innovations grant programme — $93M+ to a single-material sector — is the kind of federal programme ProPublica's environment desk covers.
International news organisation with a dedicated environment desk covering forestry, carbon markets, and ESG accountability. Track record on forest carbon offset investigations. Tips: theguardian.com/tips.
International network supporting investigative journalism on climate and environmental topics. Publishes reporter's guides on carbon offsets and greenwashing. A resource network and directory of investigative journalists in relevant jurisdictions globally.
Peer-reviewed venues
The DRL framework is offered openly for review, citation, replication, and disputation. These are the primary peer-reviewed venues where the active scientific disputes the DRL corpus engages are already on the record.
The Sohngen / Baker / Favero critique (Nature 646:E18–E19) and the Searchinger / Berry / Peng reply (E20–E23) are the active scientific exchange this framework engages directly. Nature's Matters Arising process is the formal channel for technical responses to published research. A DRL-framed response to the Sohngen critique is under preparation.
Forest Ecology and Management, Forest Policy and Economics, and Global Change Biology are the primary peer-reviewed venues for forestry carbon research. The Luyssaert old-growth sink findings and the Stephenson carbon-accumulation data are both in this literature.
Research lab at The New School, New York. Focus on building materials, embodied carbon, and material health. An invitation to contribute to the Low Carbon Metals initiative is under consideration — relevant to the DRL aluminium full-boundary analysis.